3 천 자 라디오, 텔레비전, 신문학, 영어 문헌 및 번역을 구하십시오! ! ! ! ! !
interview full-text will appear in 211 may 2 issue of the "China (Newsweek
China neek The prosecution what evidence when mastered?
answer: the procuratorial organs in review the entire case investigation organ to evidence material, Think lizhuang has sufficient evidence to prove the act constitutes a crime, shall be testified defenders hamper the prosecution, It shall be investigated for criminal respons ibility.
evidence has been lizhuang charges in a trial court case when the heave shown Lizhuang mengying evidence in the case of a mis appropriation of funds in the relevant documentary evidence; Act as his defender confirm lizhuang implementation Xu Lijun lure, instigate the testimony against facts change behavior more witness testimos Shanghai Wang dewei input on court confirmation "Shanghai things long Jintang entertainment co., ltd funds is 1 million yuan" civil Confirm mengying "instructions Jintang city of the company's financial staff, Will deliver Wang weide etc.of the company in touzi Kuan city Jintang 5, yuan RMB to the form of bank note
of its individual bank account deposit and used to return personal help industry loan ",constity Incase mengying Xu Lijun mis appropriation of funds are expected to testify in court records of change testimony.
Newsweek: inche From what way to get?
answer: the trial process, the evidence for a court-appointed Sheba, Main is to confirm Xu Lijun Wang dewei and invested funds to the Jintang city 1 million civil judgment about Xu Lijun evidence material, And witnesses in August 25 to accept a legal services in Shanghai two legal workers survey Xu Lijun, Wang dewei statement about investment company recording Jintang city information.according to the defense department statement, Recording data from lizhuang home within its mobile hard extraction.the rest of the materials department lawyer to relevant units to collect. Week: in China with the public prosecutor for a court-appointed Sheba the discrepancy between evidence embodied in what aspects? " Cause lizhuang testified that committed the sin of defenders hamper evidence exists doubt ",the question in what aspects specific performant
answer: a contradiction mainly reflects in, what exactly is Xu Lijun oneself active changed's testimony, or lizhuang de Abetted her change her testimony.
the case of the doubtful points, Through examination embodied in the defenders Sheba heave evidence that witnesses in August 25 Xu Lijun with Shanghai some law services two legal www Kers statement: she had intention to Jintang city company investment 1 million yuan, But by shareholders Zhu Liyan city Jintang 1 million yuan investment amount is too small and don't agree.xu Lijun secretly, And the mengying deliberations.mengying Xu Lijun said to won't make Xu Lijun after opening, frustration.mengying after Xu Lijun Whether ask others to Xu Lijun Xu Lijun issued by written evidence, self-proclaimed "and the" what is not investment.
Both with and Xu Lijun to March 25 mengying case investigators mis appropriation of funds for testimony touzi Kuan 1 million payment is confirmed And Xu Lijun contradict with the 21 to Chongqing judicial organs written statements and six times for Chongqing police asked the stated 1 million Uan is touzi Kuan testimony that conflict, leading to lizhuang in July 28 Xu Lijun implementation lure, Instigate against the facts change's testimony, constitute the fact that testimony sin defenders hamper existing gimmick.
answer: after the people's court adjourned jiangbei collegial panel, after appraisal think, According to the supreme people's court on the execution of criminal procedure law of the people's Republic of China > "the explanation of some issues the provisions of article 177 no operator of jiangbei people's procurator ate, before the judgment is procurator Asked to withdraw prosecution reason was established and granting withdraw prosecution ruling.
Newsweek: China will no doubt for Y investigation would ask again,
제목 Chongqing prosecutors talk about lizhuang leak case says no new evidence is prohibited from proses